Heisenberg, standing
front left, next to P.A.M. Dirac, in front of A.H. Compton, University
of Chicago, 1929. |
Broadcasters
David Peat (DP) and Paul Buckley (PB) with Werner Heisenberg
DP
Could you reminisce about the time when you arrived at the idea
of quantum mechanics?
Heisenberg:
At that time, there was general discussion among young physicists
about
the possible ways to establish a coherent quantum theory, a coherent
quantum mechanics. Among the many attempts, the most interesting
for me was the attempt of H.A. Kramers to study the dispersion
of atoms and, by doing so, to get some information about the
amplitudes for the radiation of atoms. In this connection, it occurred
to me that in the mathematical scheme these amplitudes behaved
like the elements of a mathematical quantity called a matrix.
So I tried to apply a mathematical calculus to the experiments
of Kramers, and the more general mechanical models of the
atom, which later turned out to be matrix mechanics. It so happened
at that time I became a bit ill and had to spend a holiday on
an island to be free from hay fever. It was there, having good time
to think over the questions, that I really came to this scheme of
quantum mechanics and tried to develop it in a closed mathematical
form.
My first step
was to take it to W. Pauli, a good friend of mine, and to
discuss it with him, then to Max Born in Göttingen. Actually,
Max Born
and Pascual Jordan succeeded in giving a much better shape and
more elegant form to the mathematical scheme. From the mathematical
relations I had written down, they derived the so-called
commutation relations. So, through the work of Born and Jordan,
and later Paul Dirac, the whole thing developed very quickly into
a closed mathematical scheme.
I also went
to discuss it with Niels Bohr, but I can't be sure whether this
was in July, August, or September of that year [1925].
Half a year
later the first papers of E. Schrödinger became known.
Schrödinger
tried to develop an older idea of Louis de Broglie into a new
mathematical scheme, which he called wave mechanics. He was
actually able to treat the hydrogen atom on the basis of his wave
mechanical scheme and, in the summer of 1926, he was also able
to demonstrate that his mathematical scheme and matrix mechanics
were actually two equivalent mathematical schemes, that
they could be simply translated into each other. After that time,
we all felt that this must be the final mathematical form of quantum
theory.
DP
Had you and Bohr begun the interpretation of this work before
Schrödinger's paper came out?
Heisenberg:
Of course, there was continuous discussion, but only after Schrödinger's
paper did we have a new basis for discussion, a new basis
for interpreting quantum theory. In the beginning there was strong
disagreement between Schrödinger and ourselves, not about the
mathematical scheme, but about its interpretation in physical terms.
Schrödinger thought that by his work physics could again resume
a shape which could well be compared with Maxwell's theory or
Newton's mechanics, whereas we felt that this was not possible.
Through long
discussions between Bohr and Schrödinger in the fall of 1926,
it became apparent that Schrödinger's hopes could not be fulfilled,
that one needed a new interpretation. Finally, from these discussions,
we came to the idea of the uncertainty relations, and the
rather abstract interpretation of the theory.
PB
Did Schrödinger ever like that interpretation?
Heisenberg:
He always disliked it. I would even guess that he was not convinced.
He probably thought that the interpretation which Bohr and I had
found in Copenhagen was correct in so far as it would always give
the correct results in experiments; still he didn't like the language
we used in connection with the interpretation. Besides Schrödinger,
there were also Einstein, M. von Laue, M. Planck, and others who
did not like this kind of interpretation. They felt it was too abstract,
and too far removed from the older ideas of physics.
But, as you
know, this interpretation has, at least so far, stood the test
of all experiments, whether people like it or not.
|